RelSciLab
@ HC
 current
projects
 archive
of past projects
 lab
members
 courses
 info
about senior theses
 resources
 links
 haverford
psychology
|
 |
Le, B., HCChoi,
H. N., & Beal, D. J. (2006). Pocket-sized psychology studies: Exploring
daily-diary software for Palm Pilots. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,
and Computers, 38, 325-332.
Abstract
Daily-dairies,
also known as experience sampling methods (ESM) or everyday experience
methods, are a common methodology utilized to provide insight into momentary
psychological processes. Traditionally these studies often utilized
paper and pencil surveys administered at several times each day over
a span of several days or weeks. However, advances in technology now
allow these studies to be conducted using palmtop computers (i.e., personal
digital assistants; PDAs). Three software packages for running these
studies on the Palm operating system were explored and compared on a
number of features. Specifically, ESP (Experience Sampling Program,
by Feldman Barrett & Barrett, 2001), iESP version 3.2 (Intel Experience
Sampling Program, by Intel Research Seattle and the University of Washington
Computer Science and Engineering Department), and PMAT version 2.0 (Purdue
Momentary Assessment Tool, by the Military Family Research Institute
at Purdue University) were examined, with their key features compared.
These advances in software for running diary studies include a number
of features that provide researchers with methods and information previously
unavailable in diary studies and may expand the range of possibilities
in diary study designs.
Etcheverry, P. E., & Le, B. (2005).
Thinking about commitment: Accessibility of commitment and prediction
of relationship persistence, accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice.
Personal Relationships, 12, 103-123.
Abstract
Research has demonstrated that more accessible cognitive constructs
(e.g., attitudes, stereotypes) are more likely to influence thoughts
and behaviors. The current research applies a social cognition framework
to the prediction of romantic relationship persistence (i.e., “stay-leave”
behavior), accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice. Conceptualizing
commitment as a partially cognitive construct and following from social
cognition and attitudinal research, we hypothesized that the accessibility
of commitment will moderate the association between commitment and relationship
persistence, accommodative responses, and willingness to sacrifice.
In Study 1, participants in romantic relationships responded to statements
derived from the commitment sub-scale of the Investment Model Scale.
Reaction times to these statements were used as a measure of accessibility
of commitment. In addition, participants completed measures of their
commitment level. Seven months later, participants were contacted and
relationship persistence was assessed. Accessibility of commitment significantly
moderated the association between commitment and relationship persistence.
Study 2 expanded on the results of the first study by demonstrating
that accessibility of commitment also significantly moderated the association
between commitment and accommodation and willingness to sacrifice. Taken
together, these two studies highlight the usefulness of applying social
cognitive concepts to understanding close relationships.
Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., Le,
B., & Goodfriend, W. (2004). Thinking close: Measuring relational
closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. In
D. Mashek & A. Aron (eds.), Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy
(pp. 103-115). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. <<
click to go to the publisher's website >>
Le, B., &
Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis
of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
Abstract
We conducted
a meta-analysis of Rusbult’s Investment Model of commitment. Across 52
studies, including 60 independent samples and 11,582 participants, satisfaction
with, alternatives to, and investments in a relationship each correlated
significantly with commitment to that relationship. Moreover, these three
variables collectively accounted for nearly two-thirds of the variance
in commitment. Commitment, in turn, was found to be a significant predictor
of relationship breakup. Support for the model was obtained in predicting
commitment in both relational (e.g., commitment to a romantic partnership)
and non-relational domains (e.g., commitment to one’s job), but was significantly
stronger in relational domains. Additional moderator analyses suggest
that the associations between commitment and its theorized bases vary
minimally as a function of demographic (e.g., ethnicity) or relational
(e.g., duration) factors. We review theoretical strengths and shortcomings
of the Investment Model and identify directions for future research.
Le, B., &
Agnew, C. R. (2001). Need fulfillment and emotional experience in interdependent
romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
18, 423-440.
Abstract
Drawing from
theoretical models of emotion and aspects of interdependence theory, we
investigated the association between need fulfillment, relative dependence,
and emotional experience within romantic relationships. Daily self-reports
of general and relationship-related emotional experience and perceived
fulfillment of relationship needs were collected on four consecutive days
from participants involved in romantic relationships. Consistent with
hypotheses, fulfillment of relationship needs was found to significantly
predict emotional experience, with the association at times moderated
by the geographic distance of the relationship (local versus long-distance).
In addition, participants in relationships characterized by an inequality
of dependence experienced less positive and more negative relationship-related
emotion than did participants in mutually dependent partnerships.
Note: HCHaverford College student; BMCBryn Mawr College student
|
 |