D.1. Parallel Parking an Aircraft Carrier: Re-engineering the
Calculus-Based Elementary Physics Sequence at Illinois

David K. Campbell, University of Illinois
Urbana, IL 61801

The talk is a progress reports on our efforts at UIUC to re-engineer entirely our calculus-based elementary physics sequence. The new courses are

Physics 111, a 4-unit course on mechanics;

Physics 112 , a 4-unit course on E and M;

Physics 113, a 2-unit course on fluids and thermal physics; and

Physics 114, a 2-unit course on waves and quantum physics.

I start by describing our overall situation: we educate "in bulk" (about 3500 students per year) and we have "collective ownership" of the courses, i.e., faculty rotate through in about a 3-year cycle, so maintain continuity of any revision is key. I then discuss the 3 key motivations for change--to improve the students' learning experience, to improve the faculty's teaching experience, and to provide flexibility for our "clients" (engineering departments) who want some freedom to tailor the physics sequence they take to their students' perceived needs. Our design goals have been to involve the students more actively, to provide many approaches to learning the material (using methods developed and tested by physics education research), and to enhance the training of TAs. The four components of the courses are (1) labs, based on the "predict,observe, explain" approach; (2) "lectures", which look deceptively like ordinary lectures but (crucially) contain 3 active learning segments (ACTs)1 in each lecture which allow the instructor to assess students' comprehension immediately and respond accordingly; the lectures are "scripted", so they are available on the web (beforehand, except for the ACTs) and are available in hard-copy for purchase by the students; (3) discussion sections, in which the students work in groups on context-rich problems; and (4) homework, which is done on the Web with CyberProf, an intelligent interface that provides feedback and hints on the problems and can grade the problems if desired. Faculty staffing is by a team of 3 professors per course.

I then present some samples of lecture material, including an ACT from Mechanics. A new course--Physics 100--is intended as a means of bringing under-prepared students "up to speed" to cope with the concepts/approaches of college physics. This program works at UIUC because of committed individuals, team players, and administrative support. The talk ends with a summary of lessons we've learned.


1 E. Mazur, Peer Instruction (Prentice Hall, 1997).


D.2. How Things Work: a Novel Approach for Teaching Physics
to Non-Scientists

Louis Bloomfield, University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22903

How Things Work is a course for non-science students that introduces them to physics in the context of everyday objects. How Things Work reverses the traditional format of physics courses by starting with whole objects and looking inside them to see what makes them work. Because it concentrates on concepts rather than math, and on familiar objects rather than abstract constructs, How Things Work serves both to reduce studentsí fears of science and to convey to them a substantial understanding of our modern technological world.

At the University of Virginia, How Things Work consists of two independent one semester courses. Each course covers about 25 familiar objects, ranging from bicycles to clocks and from microwave ovens to nuclear reactors. In each case, the most important physical concepts are introduced as theyíre needed to explain how the object works.

In the 6 years that I have taught How Things Work at the University of Virginia, most of the more than 4000 students who have participated in the course have found it a useful and enjoyable component of a liberal education. They come to see the understanding of physics as a basic skill that will assist them in innumerable situations throughout their adult lives. On a broader scale, How Things Work has precipitated a cultural change at the University of Virginia--physics and the physics department are no longer excluded from the rest of the academic community. Students from every part of the University have come to recognize that they can understand physics and that it does have something valuable to say to them.

The title How Things Work is magic--it attracts a larger and more diverse audience of students than I could ever have imagined. But I am not alone in this discovery. Both the title and the associated course concept have been invented and reinvented a number of times at a variety of institutions. What I offer to the academic community are the lessons I have learned from my experiences teaching the course and the course materials that I have developed for it--most notably my textbook How Things Work: the Physics of Everyday Life and the Instructorís Manual that complements the textbook.

For more information, see the following web site:
http://howthingswork.virginia.edu/course.html


Innovations in Undergraduate Education - Participant Contributions

  1. How the World Works and Using Science Fiction to Teach Astronomy
    Alfred University
    David DeGraff, david@merlin.alfred.edu
  2. Principles of Physical Science (a course for elementary and special education majors)
    Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
    P.James Moser, mose@bloomu.edu
  3. In Class Practice Problems
    Chattanooga State Technical Community College
    Dr. Sam Nally, snalley@cstcc.cc.tn
  4. Innovation: The Constructing Physics Understanding in a Computer-Supported Learning
    Environment Project (CPU Project)
    Eckerd College and Erksine College
    Dr. Anne Cox (Eckerd), coxaj@acasun.eckerd.edu
  5. Assessment Devices Particularly Suited to Influencing Student Understanding
    and Participation:
    Greenfield Community College
    Peter Letson
  6. Just-In-Time Teaching with the World Wide Web: Physics For Scientists and Engineers, Phys 152/251
    Indiana University Purdue University
    Dr. Gregor M. Novak, gnovak@iupui.edu
  7. Computational Physics
    Illinois State
    Professor Richard F. Martin, Jr., info@entropy.phy.ilstu.edu
  8. Computers in the Upper-Level Physics Curriculum
    Laser Physics in the Undergraduate Curriculum
    Lawrence University
    Dr. David M. Cook, David.M.Cook@Lawrence.edu
  9. New Junior-Senior Curriculum
    Oregon State University
    Kenneth S. Krane, kranek@physics.orst.edu
  10. Introductory Physics: Twenty-First Century ICP/21
    Seminole Community College
    Alexander Dickison, acidkison@ipo.seminole.cc.fl.us
  11. Remedial Science Courses for Entering Freshman
    Southeast Missouri State
    Dr. Midhael L. Cobb, Chairman, http://www.semo.edu
  12. Introductory Physics Course for Both Majors and Non-Majors
    Swarthmore College
    Peter J. Collings, PCOLLIN1@swarthmore.edu
  13. Interactive Video for Introductory Physics
    University of California at Santa Barbara
    Mark Sherwin, sherwin@physics.ucsb.edu
  14. Design of Multi-Disciplinary Courses for Non-Science Majors
    University of Chicago
    Isaac Abella, David Oxtoby, and Lorna Straus
  15. A Mathematica Based Introductory Physics Lab
    University of Cincinnati
    Richard Gass, gass@physunc.phy.uc.edu
  16. A Project Oriented Introductory Physics Laboratory
    University of South Carolina
    C. Steven Whisnant, whisnant@sc.edu
  17. Physics 109N Home Page: Galileo and Einstein
    University of Virginia
    Michael Fowler, http://www.phys.virginia.edu/classes/109N/home.html
  18. Converting to an Engineering Physics Major
    University of Wisconsin-Platteville
    Philip W. Young, youngp@uwplatt.edu
  19. Energy in the Environment - A First Year Seminar
    University of Vermont
    Robert Arns and Kevork Spartalian, office@mscurie.physics.uvm.edu


Next

Return to Home Page