|
BIOLOGY PROFESSOR’S IMMUNOLOGY LAB EXPOSES STUDENTS TO GRADUATE-LEVEL
RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE SETTING
| |
Jenni Punt in the classroom
|
|
When Associate Professor of Biology Jenni Punt presented
her research on “T-cell tolerance” to the Philadelphia
Haverford Alumni Network (PHAN) Nov. 5, she turned the reins over
to her assistants, who elaborated on their hypotheses, experiments,
and results, as well as the “real-world” ramifications
of their projects.
At a large university, Punt’s research assistants
may have been Ph.D. candidates or post-doctoral fellows. Here at
Haverford, she’s aided by five undergraduate students—seniors
Scott Gordon, Dan Grant, Lucy Hu (BMC), Jessica McDonald, and Nathan
Singh—who are conducting scientific research at a graduate
level. It’s an opportunity that will have long-lasting positive
repercussions for each of their futures.
“This does more than prepare them for research
careers,” says Punt, who last year received a Distinguished
Service Award for Outstanding Teaching from the American
Association of Immunologists. “It gives them a sense of
the dynamic nature of knowledge. They’ll bring a scholarly
skepticism to everything they do, in whatever careers they may have.”
Punt’s students are involved in her ongoing
explorations of what she calls the “molecular reasoning”
behind the decisions made by developing T-cells. These cells are
designed to defend our bodies against pathogens, and each is unique
because of its receptor, which allows it to engage, bind, and attack
foreign materials. But T-cells also sense proteins in the body,
including the ones that are essential to our makeup, and some wayward
cells misidentify these proteins as dangerous and attack them as
they would any pathogen.
However, these cells can be screened and destroyed.
Young T-cells are sent to a “nursery” called a thymus,
located above the heart. “The thymus is like a ‘mini-me’
of yourself,” explains Punt. “It’s a protective
environment that allows the developing cells to browse a representation
of your body.” Ninety-five percent of these cells are killed
before they can be released into the body; those that do “graduate”
from the thymus will identify and destroy only pathogens—hopefully.
“The thymus is not perfect,” says Punt.
“Not all the cells released are ready.”
The crux of her research is the paradox of why young
cells (called thymocytes) interpret a strong foreign substance as
a signal to die, while more mature cells read the same substance
as a sign to divide. Her projects are funded by a variety of sources,
including the National
Institutes of Health, the Howard
Hughes Medical Institute, and the National
Science Foundation. “Students’ ideas have often
contributed to the development of my grant proposals,” she
says.
Punt’s students aren’t merely participants
in her research; they are also encouraged to originate their own
projects. Nathan Singh spent one summer working in an immunology
and cancer studies lab at the University of Pittsburgh and was hit
by a “bolt of inspiration” that developed into his senior
project. “It involves studying the signals that guide T-cells
through the thymus during development,” he says, “and
whether or not these signals play a role in cell survival and death.”
What he loves most about his research is getting
“good data.” “In our lab some of the things we
do are really cutting-edge, so seeing great data is exciting because
you get the feeling that no one has ever seen this information before.”
Jessica McDonald, who teams up with Dan Grant to
examine a specific protein (PP2A) in the process of developing tolerant
T-cells, likes the blend of independence and collaboration in Punt’s
lab. “I also enjoy the fact that we’re actually doing
real science,” she says. “Since we’re undergrads
putting in less than 20 hours a week, it’s not like I expect
to make a big discovery, but at the same time I can plan and conduct
my experiments largely on my own, and also get input from other
members of the lab.”
Scott Gordon, who concentrates on both a protein
called Nur77 and a subset of T cells known as T regulatory cells,
appreciates the impact his and other students’ experiments
may have on pressing health issues. “Immunology is such a
fascinating and intricate field, involved in combating so many devastating
diseases and conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, type-1 diabetes,
multiple sclerosis, and lupus,” he says. “I feel that
any one of us, at any point, could discover something earth-shattering.”
In addition to its pragmatic possibilities, Dan Grant
also sees the philosophical and political importance of cell signaling
and immunology research. At the PHAN presentation in November he
expanded on what he calls the “sheer, elegant complexity of
the natural systems that surround and sustain us,” and how
human achievements often pale in comparison. “Bacteria, insects,
ecosystems—these are all things we take for granted,”
he says, “but each is representative of an organized system
that is far more capable and efficient than even the most sophisticated
machine ever created by man.” He also stresses the need for
legislation supporting scientific research, noting that the U.S.
has fallen behind many other countries in such pursuits. “Our
tendency to ban certain types of research (such as stem-cell) only
has the effect of handicapping our progress.”
Many alumni of Punt’s lab have progressed to
prestigious graduate, medical, and veterinary programs at Harvard,
Yale, Johns Hopkins, Stanford, MIT, and the University of California
at Berkeley. Her current students hope that their experience will
afford them similar options. Dan Grant’s immediate plans call
for time in a research lab at the University of Pennsylvania, while
his long-range sights are set on a career in science and health
policy. “The experience I’ve had in the Punt lab will
be a great asset because it has provided me with a strong scientific
foundation,” he says, “and allowed me to see how much
I enjoy the hands-on world of laboratory research.”
Punt is always happy to see her students meet with
post-Haverford success, but their farewells are bittersweet. “When
students leave it’s tragic,” she says, “because
they take with them intangible skills. They’re not just people
working in a lab; they’re leaving an incredible legacy.”
For their part, Punt’s young researchers see
her as much more than a teacher and supervisor. “Working with
Jenni has been a blessing,” says Nathan Singh. “She
had been an amazing mentor and has become a great friend.”
— Brenna McBride
|