Bio357
Protein Design Fall,
2002
Sharpless
217 Robert Fairman
WF
2:30-4:00
Introduction
In this course, we will survey topics in
experimental and computational protein design and do some protein design work
ourselves focusing on coiled coils, using our SGI workstations in the new
computer cluster (INSC, H205B).
The beginnings of the field of protein design can be traced back
principally to work started in the early 1980's. This field owes its beginnings largely to the pioneers who
worked out many of the basic rules that define protein folding and
stability. The two people, working
independently, who first developed the concepts in protein design are Jane
Richardson and William DeGrado. We
will focus on their work early in this course as an acknowledgement of their
contribution to this field. After
this historical introduction to the literature, we will focus on more recent
papers that introduce additional design approaches, particularly computational
approaches, followed by attempts to introduce functionality. For example, we might look at attempts
to design metal binding, heme binding, catalytic function into proteins, and
perhaps even explore the use of proteins in nanoscience and biomaterial
design. While studying important
papers on design, we will also be introducing and discussing the most important
biophysical and molecular biological techniques used in protein chemistry as
background information to help understand the experimental work.
To help you access the literature for
this course, a web page has been constructed with all the articles attached as
links or pdf’s. You’ll
find the web page at the following link:
http://trires.brynmawr.edu/coursepage.asp?cid=551
I’ll
provide the password for this course page at the first meeting.
Requirements
The
format that we will use to discuss the articles will be for pairs of students
to present papers assigned for a particular date. I will work with each pair of students in preparing for
their presentations and, depending on your particular paper, will assist in
presenting this paper, principally by introducing the background needed to
understand the paper. I will judge
several factors in presentations.
These will include (1) in-depth understanding of the paper; (2) analysis
of the presentation of the data; (3) critical assessment of the interpretation
of the data and conclusions drawn by the authors; (4) and presentation style
and ability to engage the class in discussion. Everyone is expected to read the assigned papers prior to
class and be prepared to discuss them.
Your engagement in this discussion will be a major part of your grade!.
In
addition to the assigned reading, we will have three exercises in protein design
taking advantage of our SGI workstation.
The exercises will be discussed in detail in class and you will be
working closely with me to complete these exercises.
The
grading for this course will be broken down as follows:
Presentations:
40%
Participation: 20%
SGI
exercises 40%
Syllabus
|
Date |
Lecture/project
discussion |
Paper |
|
Sep. 4 |
Review of torsion angles and rotamer
concepts |
Rotamer reviews 1 and 2 |
|
6 |
Biophysical techniques in protein
structure and design, part I |
BYOJA |
|
11 |
Biophysical techniques in protein
structure and design, part II |
BYOJA |
|
13 |
Understanding energy functions and
using InsightII. (review: Pokala & Handel, 2001) |
Online Tutorial. |
|
18 |
Design of coiled-coil structures (review: Hill et al., 2000) Due Date for Exercise #1 |
Ho & DeGrado, 1987 Hill & DeGrado, 2000 |
|
20 |
Functionalization: metal-binding (review: Kennedy & Gibney, 2001) |
Handel et al., 1993 Marsh & DeGrado, 2002 |
|
25 |
X-ray crystallographic approaches. |
Harbury et al., 1993 Harbury et al., 1998 |
|
27 |
Parameterization of coiled coils
towards class projects. |
North et al., 2001 |
|
Oct. 2 |
Computational approaches. (review: Kraemer-pecore et al., 2001) Due Date for Exercise #2 |
Desjarlais & Handel,
1995 Hellinga & Richards,
1994 |
|
4 |
Catalytic design approaches |
Yao et al., 1997 Isaac et al., 2002 |
|
9 |
Combinatorial approaches (review: Saven, 2002) |
Finucane et al., 1999 Wang & Hecht, 2002 |
|
11 |
Self-assembling polymers (Yeates & Padilla, 2002) |
Padilla et al., 2001 |
|
23 |
Design of beta-sheet proteins |
Mayo et al., 1996 (ref.) Venkatraman et al., 2002 |
|
25 |
Wrap-up of final project. Due Date for Exercise #3 |
|